MailSlurp logo

Spin up test inboxes on demand with an Email Inbox API

MailSlurp gives your team instant inboxes for end-to-end tests, staging workflows, and inbound email automation. Create inboxes in bulk, wait for messages deterministically, and assert on content without relying on shared mailboxes.

App screenshot

Instant inboxes

Provision at runtime

Create real inboxes per test, per user, or per environment without shared state.

Wait + search

Deterministic assertions

Wait for messages, search content, and avoid flaky timing-based test failures.

SDKs

Drop-in for CI

Use JavaScript/TypeScript, Java, Python, Go, and more to integrate quickly.

Webhooks

Automation-ready

Trigger workflows on new email, attachments, or delivery events with webhooks and inbox-native routing patterns.

Core capabilities

What teams need when email workflows matter

Create inboxes in bulk for parallel tests

Generate many inboxes at once so parallel test runs stay isolated and reliable across CI workers.

  • Bulk create
  • Isolation
  • Parallel CI

Wait for specific messages without flakiness

Use wait and search APIs to assert on OTPs, verification emails, password resets, and notifications reliably.

  • Wait for email
  • Search
  • Assertions

Parse email content and attachments with one API

Extract links, tokens, attachments, and headers so tests and services can validate the full message payload.

  • HTML + text
  • Attachments
  • Headers

Move from tests to production workflows when needed

Keep the same inbox primitives for staging and production automation, with retention controls, routing, and clear visibility.

  • Retention controls
  • Audit history
  • Scale

Team use cases

How engineering, QA, and operations teams use MailSlurp

QA + release engineering

Email flows in CI and end-to-end tests

Test sign-up, login links, OTPs, password resets, invites, and notifications using isolated inboxes.

  • Reduce flaky failures from shared mailboxes
  • Increase confidence in release gating
  • Validate message content, links, and attachments

Engineering

Staging and sandbox inbox infrastructure

Provision inboxes per environment so teams can reproduce workflows without polluting production mailboxes.

  • Keep staging mail flows realistic and testable
  • Avoid managing disposable inbox providers manually
  • Standardize inbox patterns across teams

Automation owners

Webhook-driven routing and automation

Trigger jobs from inbound messages and route results into finance, support, and operations systems without polling.

  • Turn inbound email into structured events
  • Automate inbox workflows across services
  • Reduce operational overhead for email-heavy workflows

Getting started

Get this working quickly, then build on it

Day 1

Replace one flaky test flow

Pick one high-value test flow (sign-up, reset, OTP) and make it deterministic with isolated inboxes and waits.

  • Create an inbox in the test setup
  • Run the flow and wait for the expected message
  • Assert on links/tokens and complete the user journey

Week 1

Scale to parallel CI runs

Provision inboxes per test worker and run email suites in parallel without shared mailbox contention.

  • Bulk create inboxes per CI worker
  • Add search assertions for key message variants
  • Capture failures with message payload snapshots

Week 2+

Adopt inbox primitives across teams

Standardize inbox patterns across QA, engineering, and operations to reduce duplicated tooling and inconsistent workflows.

  • Create reusable inbox helpers and SDK wrappers
  • Define retention and access rules for inbox lifecycle
  • Add webhooks for automation use cases when needed

Team fit

How different teams get value

QA leads

Challenge: Email tests become flaky when teams share inboxes and rely on timing heuristics.

What improves: Use isolated inboxes and deterministic waits for stable CI pipelines.

Engineering managers

Challenge: Ad-hoc inbox tooling creates maintenance overhead and inconsistent test coverage.

What improves: Standardize email testing and inbox automation on one platform.

DevOps and release owners

Challenge: Release gates are unreliable when email workflows are hard to validate in automation.

What improves: Add deterministic inbox checks that scale to parallel builds.

Customer outcomes

What gets better once MailSlurp is in place

  • Fewer flaky failures

    Replace timing-based waiting and shared inboxes with deterministic APIs designed for test orchestration.

  • Faster debugging

    Capture message payloads and attachments so failures are actionable without manual mailbox inspection.

  • Better release confidence

    Gate releases on real inbox flows for the journeys that matter most to customers.

  • Reusable primitives

    One inbox API supports testing, staging, and automation workflows without re-architecting later.

Ready to try this with your own workflow?

FAQ

Questions people ask before they start

Is this only for disposable inboxes?

No. You can use disposable or persistent inboxes, custom domains, and inbox pools depending on your workflow.

Does this work with parallel test runners?

Yes. Provision inboxes per worker and keep test runs isolated so messages never collide.

Can we test attachments and rich HTML emails?

Yes. MailSlurp supports parsing HTML, text, headers, and attachments so you can validate complete payloads.

Do you have SDKs for common languages?

Yes. MailSlurp supports JavaScript/TypeScript, Java, Python, Go, PHP, and more.