Safe capture
No accidental sends
Route non-production SMTP traffic into controlled inboxes instead of real customer mailboxes.
MailSlurp Email Sandbox captures SMTP traffic from dev, staging, and QA so teams can inspect messages and automate checks. Replace manual inbox review and flaky timing heuristics with deterministic inbox APIs built for CI.

Safe capture
No accidental sends
Route non-production SMTP traffic into controlled inboxes instead of real customer mailboxes.
Deterministic waits
CI-ready checks
Wait for matching emails, extract links/codes, and fail fast on timeouts and regressions.
Isolated inboxes
Parallel builds
Provision inboxes per worker or per run so messages never collide across CI pipelines.
Deep inspection
Actionable debugging
Inspect headers, HTML/text, attachments, and metadata to diagnose failures quickly.
Core capabilities
Point your application at sandbox credentials and start capturing test traffic immediately, without changing your workflow.
Block until the right email arrives, then assert on subject, sender, links, tokens, headers, and attachments.
Catch broken links, missing images, and risky template changes before they ship to customers.
Adopt one platform for inbox capture, test automation, webhooks, and operational workflows with audit-ready controls.
Team use cases
QA + release engineering
Gate releases on the inbox flows that protect onboarding, auth, and billing reliability.
Product engineering
Validate sign-up, reset, invites, and notifications in staging with isolated inboxes and deterministic waits.
Platform teams
Provide shared inbox primitives for dev, staging, and CI so teams ship consistent messaging workflows.
Getting started
Day 1
Route a single non-production workflow to a sandbox inbox so your team can inspect messages and define checks.
Week 1
Add deterministic waits and payload assertions so regressions fail builds automatically.
Week 2+
Scale coverage to templates that impact revenue and customer trust.
Team fit
Challenge: Manual inbox review and timing heuristics make CI suites slow and unreliable.
What improves: Run deterministic email checks with isolated inboxes per test run.
Challenge: Email regressions ship when release gates are weak or inconsistent across teams.
What improves: Adopt repeatable inbox assertions as a standard release control.
Challenge: Multiple tools exist for fake SMTP, inboxes, and QA, but ownership is unclear.
What improves: Centralize inbox capture and automation primitives in one platform.
Customer outcomes
Safer staging and QA
Capture non-production traffic in controlled inboxes to avoid accidental sends and messy mailbox sprawl.
More reliable automation
Deterministic waits and isolation reduce flaky failures and increase confidence in release gates.
Faster debugging
Inspect the full payload (headers, HTML, attachments) to fix regressions quickly.
Clear upgrade path
Start with one workflow, then expand coverage and add team controls as your team scales.
Ready to try this with your own workflow?
FAQ
Yes. Connect any SMTP-capable application to capture email in sandbox inboxes and automate checks with APIs.
Yes. Provision inboxes per worker or per run so messages never collide across parallel builds.
Yes. Wait for matching emails and assert on extracted links/codes, headers, HTML/text, and attachments.
No. Start with one high-impact workflow, then expand to more templates and environments as you see reliability gains.