Private inboxes
No shared sandboxes
Create unique inboxes per test run or per user so messages never collide.
MailSlurp gives engineering and QA teams real inboxes on demand. Test sign-up, OTP, resets, invites, and notifications with deterministic wait APIs instead of shared sandboxes and flaky timing.

Private inboxes
No shared sandboxes
Create unique inboxes per test run or per user so messages never collide.
Deterministic waits
Stable CI suites
Wait for specific messages and assert on content without flaky sleeps and retries.
Webhooks + rules
Automation-ready
Trigger workflows on inbound email events and route results to your systems.
SDKs for teams
Fast onboarding
Integrate with JavaScript/TypeScript, Java, Python, Go, and more using maintained SDKs.
Core capabilities
Provision inboxes at runtime for CI workers, staging, and automation so test data stays isolated and debuggable.
Extract links and codes, validate templates, and assert on complete message payloads with wait and search APIs.
Validate the content that breaks real user journeys: HTML, attachments, headers, and metadata.
Add retention controls, access rules, and clear visibility so email testing and automation stay easy to manage.
Team use cases
QA + release engineering
Replace shared sandboxes with private inboxes and deterministic waits so suites are stable and failures are reproducible.
Product engineering
Validate sign-up, billing, and notification workflows against real inbox behavior before release.
Platform teams
Use one API platform for inbox creation, waiting, parsing, and event-driven workflows across teams.
Getting started
Day 1
Pick a high-impact workflow and replace sandbox mailboxes and timing heuristics with inbox + wait APIs.
Week 1
Add stable coverage for OTP, reset, invites, and notifications across your environments and CI pipelines.
Week 2+
Create shared helpers and team standards so email testing and automation stays consistent and easy to manage.
Team fit
Challenge: Shared sandboxes and timing-based checks make email tests flaky and hard to debug.
What improves: Ship stable CI suites with deterministic waits and isolated inboxes.
Challenge: Email regressions slip into production because automated validation is incomplete or unreliable.
What improves: Add dependable release gates for critical customer journeys.
Challenge: Multiple teams reinvent mailbox tooling and nobody owns the end-to-end workflow reliability.
What improves: Standardize inbox primitives and team standards across your organization.
Customer outcomes
Higher CI reliability
Deterministic wait patterns reduce flaky runs and improve signal quality in pipelines.
Better coverage
Validate links, codes, templates, headers, and attachments in the workflows that drive revenue.
Faster debugging
Inspect message payloads directly instead of hunting through shared sandbox mailboxes.
Reusable primitives
Inbox APIs, waits, and webhooks are reusable across QA, staging, and automation workflows.
Ready to try this with your own workflow?
FAQ
Many teams start with testing and then reuse the same inbox and webhook primitives for staging and automation workflows.
Yes. Create isolated inboxes per worker so messages never collide and suites remain predictable.
Yes. You can fetch HTML, parse headers, and download or assert on attachments and full payload details.
Yes. Use SDKs or REST APIs to create inboxes, wait for messages, and extract links or codes in any test runner.