Make Tosca email validation repeatable with real inboxes and evidence

MailSlurp provisions disposable inboxes and provides deterministic wait helpers so Tosca suites can validate sign-up, password reset, and MFA email steps without shared mailboxes or manual inbox checks.

App screenshot

Works with your QA stack

  • Cypress
  • Playwright
  • Selenium
  • Testim
  • Power Automate

Trusted by teams at

Used by engineering, QA, lifecycle, and operations teams building and testing email and SMS workflows.

  • Broadcom
  • Scraper
  • Trivago
  • Avast
  • Wolt
  • Panasonic

Disposable inboxes

Per run

Generate unique email addresses for clean fixtures and parallel-safe execution.

Deterministic waits

Release gates

Wait for matching emails and extract links or OTP codes without flaky sleeps.

Payload evidence

Actionable failures

Capture headers, bodies, and attachments as evidence for change control and audits.

Enterprise-ready

Scale coverage

Upgrade for volume, retention, and team workflows as your QA program grows.

Core capabilities

Tosca integration capabilities teams can act on

Provision inboxes on demand for isolated runs

Create real inboxes per workflow so Tosca runs always have clean, unique user identities.

  • Disposable inboxes
  • Parallel-safe
  • Clean fixtures

Wait for emails and extract OTP codes or links

Use deterministic wait helpers to find the right message and parse codes, anchors, and links reliably.

  • OTP codes
  • Magic links
  • Reset links

Assert on HTML, attachments, and headers

Validate templates, links, headers, and attachments to improve release confidence.

  • HTML parsing
  • Attachments
  • Header checks

Standardize evidence for stakeholders

Store evidence for failed gates and reduce time-to-diagnosis with clear payload visibility.

  • Evidence
  • Governance
  • Faster diagnosis

Team use cases

Ways teams use MailSlurp for Tosca integration

QA automation engineers

Verify onboarding and authentication emails in Tosca

Test the full customer journey by asserting on real inbox messages in your suite.

  • Capture verification links and OTP codes
  • Reduce flaky failures from timing and shared inboxes
  • Prove onboarding flows before release

Platform and DevEx teams

Standardize email validation across squads

Create reusable patterns for inbox provisioning, waits, and content validation.

  • Enable parallel runs without mailbox collisions
  • Reduce test glue across teams
  • Create a consistent playbook for debugging failures

Release managers

Gate releases with evidence

Convert manual spot checks into regression gates with clear evidence when workflows fail.

  • Catch broken templates before customers do
  • Shorten incident response with payload evidence
  • Increase confidence in staged releases

Start testing

Start previewing customer emails quickly

Day 1

Add one inbox validation to a critical workflow

Start with a single workflow and validate email receipt plus one key assertion.

  • Create a disposable inbox during the run
  • Trigger a workflow email from the app
  • Wait for the email and extract the code or link

Week 1

Make evidence consistent in CI

Turn the workflow into a reusable pattern and store evidence for failures.

  • Provision inboxes per runner to avoid collisions
  • Store payload evidence when gates fail
  • Add assertions for HTML, headers, and attachments

Week 2+

Scale and standardize

Expand patterns to more workflows and standardize how failures are investigated.

  • Create shared helpers for inbox and wait logic
  • Add monitoring around workflow failures
  • Upgrade for higher volume, retention, and team access

Customer use cases

Where MailSlurp helps

Enterprise release stakeholders

Challenge: Critical messaging workflows fail without clear evidence or repeatable QA gates.

What improves: Turn email workflows into regression gates with payload evidence.

Teams running parallel CI

Challenge: Shared inboxes and time-based sleeps cause flaky tests and non-deterministic failures.

What improves: Use disposable inboxes and deterministic waits to keep suites reliable under load.

QA teams scaling coverage

Challenge: Manual inbox checks and shared mailboxes do not scale with coverage growth.

What improves: Automate inbox validation and standardize patterns across teams.

Better email releases

What gets easier before send time

  • Less flakiness

    Replace sleeps and shared mailboxes with deterministic waits and isolation.

  • Faster diagnosis

    Inspect email payloads, links, headers, and attachments when tests fail.

  • Parallel-safe

    Run many workflows without mailbox collisions or fragile cleanup logic.

  • Clear upgrade path

    Start free, then scale volume, retention, and team access as programs expand.

Ready to test your next email?

FAQ

Common questions before starting

Can we run these checks in parallel?

Yes. Provision inboxes per runner or per run so messages never collide across parallel builds.

Can we test password reset and account verification flows?

Yes. Teams commonly assert on OTP codes, magic links, and reset links in sign-up and auth workflows.

Can we parse HTML and download attachments?

Yes. You can fetch HTML/text bodies, headers, and attachments to validate real customer content.

Do you support team workflows?

Yes. Upgrade for retention, governance, and team access as your QA program scales.